
 |
Builder
& Remodelor, February 2005
By
Michele Francis |
Due
to a traditionally slow final holiday week of trading in 2004, bonds
were up only slightly, creating a slight dip in mortgage interest
rates. The first week of 2005 saw the release of two key reports
that typically have a direct correlation on the direction of home
loan interest rates. The mixed results of these two reports, coupled
with a revision of the previous month’s results probably explains
why 2005’s beginning mortgage rates are largely unchanged
from where they ended last year. Let’s examine.
January
3rd’s release of the Institute for Supply Management’s
(ISM) factory index figure of 58.6 for December, up from 57.8 in
November, was the highest since August. The weather could be a factor,
with higher temperatures driving the price of crude oil down; thereby
reducing the costs on, and increasing spending into, the manufacturing
industry. This bodes well for the economy as it adds to confidence
of continued growth. Interest rate shoppers for home loans were
not likely to feel enthused, however, as the general rule of thumb
states: “good for the economy – bad for mortgage rates.”
While
the ISM factory index had the potential to affect interest rates,
Friday’s release of the jobs report for December had more
potential to impact the treasuries and, with them, mortgage rates.
The U.S. Department of Labor reported on Friday that there was a
significant increase in jobs created from November’s total
of 112,000. My first reaction to these numbers was to brace for
a noticeable spike in the yield on the 10 year Treasury note and
mortgage rates. The spike never happened. Why? Although the 157,000
new jobs created in December is a respectable number, it fell short
of the anticipated number of 175,000. Furthermore, November’s
total of 112,000 was revised up to 137,000, thereby lessening the
gain in December.
The
above numbers serve to demonstrate that predicting the direction
rates are going to take is far from an exact science. The reports
we discussed are two common determining factors but, as in this
case, the numbers are always open to revision. Ask several experts
and you will likely get very different answers. Last January saw
numerous predictions that the interest rate party was over and that
rates would begin a long and steady climb in 2004. What did we see?
There were interest rate spikes, to be sure. However, the rate increases
never sustained themselves. Instead, mortgage rates in 2004 rose
and fell but eventually finished the year slightly lower then the
previous year.
Last
year’s story should not diminish the significance of this
week’s reports and their effect on rates. The short term results
will be apparent soon enough. What is much more elusive, however,
will be how the market will play out over the next year.
Back
|